Ugh. stupid dresses. Stupid body
Jun. 5th, 2004 05:25 pmI went out looking for a dress for
whuffle and
halleyscomet's wedding this afternoon.
Stupid dresses and stupid body about sums it up. For a small brief shining time, my top half and my bottom half were in balance. Granted, it was a balance at Size 28, but it was BALANCE. I could buy dresses without even thinking about it.
Seems I've dieted my way back to being out of whack, although now it's my bottom half that needs more room than my top half. Tried one about 15 dresses today, and the ones that fit my top made my ass look like I'd shoved a ham up my dress. Dresses that fit my bottom drooped or fell off or showed three quarters of my bra, or fit like canvas sacks.
The only dress that came close to fitting both (fitted bodice, flowy skirt) was a size too small overall, and showed about 30 acres of cleavage. As much as I normally appreciate that look, not really want I want for a fancy wedding.
Grrrrrr.
Stupid dresses and stupid body about sums it up. For a small brief shining time, my top half and my bottom half were in balance. Granted, it was a balance at Size 28, but it was BALANCE. I could buy dresses without even thinking about it.
Seems I've dieted my way back to being out of whack, although now it's my bottom half that needs more room than my top half. Tried one about 15 dresses today, and the ones that fit my top made my ass look like I'd shoved a ham up my dress. Dresses that fit my bottom drooped or fell off or showed three quarters of my bra, or fit like canvas sacks.
The only dress that came close to fitting both (fitted bodice, flowy skirt) was a size too small overall, and showed about 30 acres of cleavage. As much as I normally appreciate that look, not really want I want for a fancy wedding.
Grrrrrr.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-05 10:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-05 11:12 pm (UTC)Viva la potato sack!
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-06 02:00 am (UTC)Would a nice mix-n-match outfit work better? Not as fancy as a dress, but I imagine that it would be better to have something that fits well and you feel great in than something that you're constantly worrying about.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-06 08:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-06 09:20 pm (UTC)Size wise, these days, I seem to be about a 16-18 top, or a 14-16 if we're talking "Women's sizes". Bottoms, about a 20, or a 16-18 if we're talking womens.
Perhaps I will take a swing by Avenue and see what I can score there. Do you know where there's a AUgust Max around here?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-06 10:09 pm (UTC)One guest is thinking of going in a "Cat in the Hat" outfit.
A few others have offered to show up in Ren Fair Garb.
It seems everyone wants to play the "Squick Matt's Mom" game at the wedding.
As for "Fancy," remember that this will be a garden party reception. Croquet and ring toss are planned. Comfort should take precedence over form.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-07 03:46 am (UTC)My beautiful wedding dress (a deep burgundy poly-velvet) cost about $45 in materials (fabric, notions, and a too-small pattern) and $150 at a simply wonderful Chinese tailor. She totally had to rebuild the pattern. She finished in a week, despite this. Next time I need fine evening wear, I promised I'd give her two.
Even if you buy a dress that's too large up top off the rack, a good seamstress can alter it (around here) for under $20.
Trust me. Finding a good seamstress has ended a LOT of my shopping frustration.
-Carlota (Linger)